A focal length range of 55-200 mm on a camera with a DX sensor delivers the same field of view as an 825-300 mm lens on a camera with an FX sensor. VR is not so important in fish eye or ultra wide angle lenses though.
Nikon 55 200 Vs 55 300 - If you're searching for video and picture information linked to the key word you have come to visit the right blog. Our website gives you hints for seeing the highest quality video and picture content, search and locate more enlightening video articles and images that match your interests. comprises one of thousands of video collections from various sources, particularly Youtube, therefore we recommend this movie that you view. This blog is for them to stop by this site.
Nikon Af S Dx Nikkor 55 300mm F 4 5 5 6g Ed Since 2 2013 Nikon Binoculars Photographer
On my D7000 is feels better balanced that might be a consideration as well.
Nikon 55 200 vs 55 300. The front element rotates when focusing which makes using a circular polarizer harder. The 55-300mm lens covers the entire range of the 55-200mm lens plus a little bit more. Help me in choosing Nikon 55-300mm vs 55-200mm.
I had the 55-200 and it was good but not as good as the 55-300. The 55-200 is very light but its plastic and smaller glass. When wide the 300 mm seems to suffer particularly strongly in corner and edge sharpness while center holds its own pretty well.
Nikon AF-S DX 55200 mm f456G ED VR II D7100 65 mm f56 1640 sec. The 70-300mm is reputed to have better edge sharpness at 300mm and better focusing in dim light or subjects with softer edges. Ive heard hit and miss reviews regarding the Nikon 55-300 lens.
The 70-300 VR is much much more quality. The 55-300mm clearly beats the 55-200mm as the focal length is proportional to the zoom capability of the lens. The extra 100mm makes it worth the extra cost alone.
Although there is a big difference of price I choose the 70-300 for the reach. To be honest you wont get a cheap quality solution in the zoom category. In reply to nikonfreak Mar 10 2010 Nikon D5000 70-300 VR 300 mm 450 mm DX.
Part of liking the 70-300 compared to the 55-300 and the 55-200 is the added weight and size. But all benefits have their corresponding drawbacks. That is its chief selling point.
If youre on a bit of a tight budget Tamron also makes a 70-300 VC Tamrons version of VR that in my experiences with these two lenses I have used both is that the Tamron is actually sharper between 200-300mm wide open. I found the 55-300mm to be an excellent lens. Nikon 55-200 VR or 70-300 VR.
The downside is that it is a tad less sharp on average than the 55-200 VR. The more traditional upgrade as braineack mentioned above is to get the 70-300 VR. The 55-200mm has gotten very favorable reviews it is lighter and swapping those could give you a little better money situation.
Coming back to your issue 55-300 is equally good but 70-300 is superior thanks to its VR II and ED elements. At 55mm the 55-200mm is fairly neutral and the 18-200mm has a lot of pincushion distortion. I got the 55-200 on eBay for a good price to test if I would rather like the 70-200 f28 or the 70-300.
There is no sign in the image quality of how small light and inexpensive the zoom lens was with which this photo was made. Of course having the ability to zoom from zero to infinity anytime is great to have. Ceramic Coat your Airstream RV email.
The 55-300 has 9 rounded aperture blades and a lens design that produces outstanding bokeh - advantage 55-300. As you zoom to 200mm the 55-200 falls apart compared to the 55-300mm even for corners and edges. I have both the Nikon versions the 55-200 and 70-300 and so can stress upon the fact that VR is a must when it comes to a zoom lens.
Since the 55-300 covers a longer total range than the 70-200 it pays a slight price in overall image quality. The biggest difference will be in distortion and that varies by the focal length at which you compare. I have the 55-200 VR and love it.
The new lens is built ve. The 55-300 shoots at f5 wide open at 200 and the 55-200 at f 56 - advantage to the 55-300. The 55-300 has a larger focal range.
It just feels more solid and takes better pics. The 55-300 has much better magnification ratio which gives it very competent tele-macro capability - advantage 55-300. Along with my over 27 years of experience owning Nikon SLR lenses I seriously doubt Nikon would make the 55-200mm a dud.
The AF speed is also slightly less.
Canon Lenses Vs Nikon Lenses 2009 2010 Nikon Lenses Nikon Best Digital Camera
Nikon Af S Dx Nikkor 55 200mm F 4 5 6g Ed Vr Telephoto Zoom Lens Ebay Nikon D7200 Nikon D3300 Nikon
Nikon Af S Dx Nikkor 18 300mm F 3 5 6 3g Ed Vr Lens Ebay Nikon D7200 Nikon 3400 Nikon
Nikon Announces Two New Lenses The 300mm F 4 And The 55 200mm F 4 5 5 6 Ii Nikon Dx Nikon Zoom Lens
Refurbished Nikon D3100 Digital Slr Camera Nikon 18 55mm Vr Lens Nikon 55 300mm Vr Lens 8gb Memory D900 Nikon D3100 Digital Slr Camera Camera Nikon
Nikon Af S Dx Zoom Nikkor 55 200mm F 4 5 6g Ed Lens Nikon Lens Nikon Dslr
Nikon Af S Dx Nikkor 55 200mm F 4 5 6g Ed Vr Ii Lens Zoom Lens Nikon Telephoto Zoom Lens
Nikon 55 300 Lens Product Shot 1 Nikon Vr Lens Lens Filters
Nikon 55 200mm F 4 5 6g Af S Dx Nikkor Lens Camera Nikon Zoom Lens Nikon Lenses
